Prudeta
2026 INSC 306
๐ Paras 2-3
Respondents filed an application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, for a succession certificate to receive the retiral benefits of their deceased father, Om Prakash Maheshwari. They claimed to be his daughters, stating their mother had predeceased him. The employer opposed this, citing the official record listing the wife as Malti Maheswari, not Asha Maheswari. The Succession Certificate was granted.
๐ Para 4
Whether an application under Order IX Rule XIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), to set aside an ex parte order granting a Succession Certificate, was maintainable when the party had appeared in a subsequent appeal against the said order.
๐ *Paras 7-10
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required ยท 14-day free trial