Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 357
📌 Paras 3-10
The appellant, a former Minister in Jharkhand, appealed against the High Court's rejection of his application for suspension of sentence and bail during the pendency of his appeal. The prosecution alleged that the appellant, along with another minister, acquired assets disproportionate to their known income, including land and a bungalow. It was further alleged that the appellant floated construction companies, obtained government contracts, and misused his position to illegally acquire tribal lands in violation of the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908, often in his wife's name and with the connivance of public officials. Chargesheets were filed for offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, leading to convict
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial