Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 362
📌 Paras 4-19
The appeals arose from complaints concerning lands in Survey No. 12 of Doddagubbi Village, Bengaluru. The complainant purchased a plot in a layout developed by Joseph Chacko, who had obtained GPAs from original landowners. Later, the complainant was informed of conspiracy involving alleged creation of forged GPAs, execution of sale deeds, and confirmation deeds. Accused individuals allegedly misrepresented documents, procured signatures under false pretences, and used these to transfer the complainant's property without her consent or consideration. The complainant asserted that these actions were part of a premeditated design to deprive plot purchasers of their properties.
📌 Para 4
The core issue involved the scope of i
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial