Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 401
📌 Paras 2-6
The Appellant, Messer Griesheim GmbH, obtained a judgment against the Respondent, Goyal MG Gases Private Limited, in the English High Court. The Appellant subsequently initiated execution proceedings in India to enforce this foreign judgment. The Respondent contested these proceedings, raising objections regarding the jurisdiction of the English Court and the validity of the service of process. The High Court of Delhi, in its impugned order, set aside the execution proceedings, finding that the English Court lacked the necessary jurisdiction to pass the judgment against the Respondent.
📌 Para 4
Whether the English Court, which passed the judgment sought to be executed in India, had the requisite territorial jurisdiction o
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial