Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 393
📌 Paras 3-6
The dispute originated from a Deed of Agreement for Sale dated 20.04.2007 between the appellant's alleged uncle, Mr. Appu John, and Respondent No. 1. Following Mr. Appu John's death, Respondent No. 1 initiated arbitration against Respondent No. 2, alleging a violation of the agreement. An arbitral award was passed in favour of Respondent No. 1, directing Respondent No. 2 to execute a sale deed. The appellant, who claims a 1/3rd share in the property via a preliminary decree from a 1995 partition suit, was impleaded in the execution proceedings in 2021, having been informed of the arbitration in 2012.
📌 Para 9
The core issue before the Court was whether the appropriate remedy for legal heirs aggrieved by an arbitral award
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial