Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 640
📌 Paras 3-7
The Appellant's father, a government employee, died in a road accident under suspicious circumstances. The Appellant's mother was charged with his murder, though later acquitted by the trial court, with an appeal pending against the acquittal. The mother initially stated post-death benefits should be in her name but later expressed no objection to her sons receiving benefits. The Appellant sought compassionate appointment, but his claim was initially rejected and subsequently declined by the authorities, leading to the present appeal.
📌 Paras 2, 8
Whether Rule 23(1) of the Haryana Civil Services (Compassionate Financial Assistance or Appointment) Rules, 2019, which suspends compassionate financial assistance claims when a
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial