Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 641
📌 Paras 2-4
Appellants were appointed as Clerk-cum-Salesman and Peon-cum-Chowkidar in a cooperative society in 2014 following a public advertisement and selection process. Their appointments were annulled by administrative authorities and affirmed by the High Court for allegedly violating Rule 3 of the Service Rules, 2003, which mandated the presence and concurrence of specific departmental authorities during appointment decisions. The Appellants contended that they had no role in the alleged procedural defects, had rendered long and unblemished service, and that the defects were attributable to the appointing authority.
📌 Para 2, Chunk 2, Chunk 4
Whether an appointment made through a duly advertised selection process, where the cand
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial