Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 630
📌 Paras 2-3
The appellant, a member of the Border Security Force (BSF), was dismissed from service after a Staff Court of Inquiry found he had contracted a second marriage during the subsistence of his first marriage without obtaining the necessary permission from the competent authority. The inquiry exonerated him of abduction charges. He was served with a show cause notice under the BSF Rules, 1969, leading to his dismissal. His writ petition before the Delhi High Court was dismissed on the grounds of forum non conveniens, holding that no part of the cause of action arose within its territorial jurisdiction.
📌 Para 1, Chunk 1
Whether the Delhi High Court was justified in refusing to entertain the appellant's writ petition on the gr
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial