Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 441
📌 Paras 1-2
The Supreme Court noted non-compliance by several States and Union Territories in appointing Nodal Officers, as previously directed. This inaction impeded the functioning of National Law Universities and the implementation of statutory mandates affecting vulnerable sections. The Court also considered the broader implementation of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and a query regarding the upward movement of meritorious candidates in reserved categories. The Union of India provided an explanation for the latter, which the Court endorsed.
📌 Paras 1-3
The core issues before the Court were the persistent non-compliance by States and Union Territories with judicial directions regarding the appointment of Nodal
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial