Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 413
📌 Paras 1-5
The appeal arose from a High Court judgment that reversed a Wakf Tribunal's decision. The plaintiffs (respondents) sued for injunction and declaration, challenging a Wakf Board letter allotting land to a second defendant for an Edgah. Plaintiffs claimed ownership based on sale deeds tracing title to a 1945 partition deed, asserting the land was 'personal inam'. The Wakf Board (appellant) contended it was 'service inam' land, thus Wakf property and inalienable. The Tribunal dismissed the suit, but the High Court allowed the plaintiffs' revision, finding the defendants failed to prove it was Wakf property and that plaintiffs established title and possession.
📌 Paras 6-7
The core issue was whether the suit property constitut
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial