Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 666
📌 Paras 2-6
The appellant was arrested on July 13, 2025, in connection with an FIR alleging cybercrimes involving extortion and the use of mule bank accounts. The appellant's alleged role was providing logistical support, including transporting cheque books, ATM cards, and SIM cards, and facilitating payments. He was remanded to police and then judicial custody. A chargesheet was filed on September 2, 2025, and cognizance was taken. The appellant sought default bail, contending that the charge sheet and related documents were not supplied within the statutory period.
📌 Paras 8-9, Chunk 2
Whether the non-filing of a copy of the charge sheet, or the non-supply of all related documents to the accused within the statutory period, entitle
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial