Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 674
📌 Paras 2-2.3
The appellant (LMT) developed a mobile application for the respondent (SCB) under an IT Professional Services Agreement. Following the app's launch, SCB instructed LMT to remove it, leading LMT to claim significant losses and file a civil suit. LMT subsequently filed an application to introduce additional documents (emails, vendor agreements, backend data) and recall a witness. The High Court rejected this application, finding no reasonable cause for the delay and deeming it contrary to the objectives of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
📌 Para 4
Whether the High Court's rejection of the appellant's application to file additional documents and recall a witness, on the grounds of lacking reasonable cause, was in accordanc
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial