Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 663
📌 Paras 1-3
The Supreme Court had previously directed the State to ensure minimum disruption to vendors' livelihoods during relocation, requiring adequate support and fair practices. Subsequent orders involved interaction with Chandigarh officials and perusal of amicus curiae submissions. An affidavit by the Municipal Corporation detailed anti-encroachment drives, vendor registration numbers, basic amenities in vending zones, and license cancellations for non-payment of dues.
📌 Para 4
The core issues revolved around the effectiveness of anti-encroachment drives, the meaningful rehabilitation of displaced vendors, the impact of mass license cancellations, the need for timely disposal of pending appeals, the extension of directions to
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial