Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 705
📌 Paras 3-3.4
The appellants are sons of late Thimmadasappa. Thimmadasappa sold property in Sy. No. 1/4 via registered sale deeds in 1971 and 1972 to Venkatappa, who then sold it to the plaintiff (respondent) in 1973. Separately, Sy. No. 162, belonging to a temple, was re-granted to Thimmadasappa in 1982. In 1997, a rectification deed was executed between the fourth defendant (Venkatappa) and the plaintiff, changing the survey number in the 1973 sale deed from Sy. No. 1/4 to Sy. No. 162. In 2005, Thimmadasappa partitioned Sy. No. 162 between the appellants.
📌 Para 4
Whether the partition deed executed by Thimmadasappa concerning Sy. No. 162 was binding on the plaintiff, who claimed ownership based on a sale deed that was subsequently
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial