Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 712
📌 Paras 2-4
The present appeal concerns a suit for partition and separate possession of properties originally belonging to Basayya. His daughters (plaintiffs) claimed a share, alleging that after their brother Basalingaiah inherited the properties, his daughter Basamma (appellant no.1) became the sole heir upon his death. Basamma allegedly mutated the property records in her name and asserted exclusive ownership, prompting the partition suit. The Trial Court dismissed the suit, finding the plaintiffs failed to prove their rights and that Basamma could alienate the properties. The First Appellate Court agreed the properties were not ancestral but found sale deeds by Basamma invalid, declaring her the owner in possession.
📌 Para 7
Whet
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial