Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 703
📌 Paras 2-2.i
The respondents (original plaintiffs) instituted a suit for declaration of title, recovery of possession, and cancellation of a sale deed. The dispute arose from a second sale deed executed by the third defendant in favour of the appellants (original defendants) concerning property previously sold by the third defendant to another party, whose title eventually vested in the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs contended the second sale deed was void as they held title to the entire property via an earlier sale deed. The appellants denied the execution of a crucial sale deed relied upon by the plaintiffs.
📌 Paras 1, and as framed in Chunk 2
Whether the High Court, in a second appeal, could proceed to decide the matter on merits wi
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial