Prudeta
Prudeta
2026 INSC 700
📌 Paras 1-6
The appellant entered into an Agreement to Sell with the respondent for a property including a factory. The appellant paid Rs. 9,00,000 as earnest money, with the Sale Deed initially due on June 22, 2004. Subsequent agreements extended this date to January 22, 2005. The appellant appeared before the Sub-Registrar on January 20 and 24, 2005, but the respondent did not. The appellant filed a suit for specific performance or, alternatively, recovery of earnest money and damages. The respondent denied the agreement, alleging the documents were signed in blank for a separate travel arrangement and were later converted into an Agreement to Sell.
📌 Para 9
Whether the High Court, in a regular second appeal, was justified in distu
The bench further analyzed the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions and discussed the interpretation of Articles 14 and 21 in light of recent precedents...
Citing the ratio in prior decisions, the court held that the legislative intent was to ensure...
No credit card required · 14-day free trial